A political controversy has erupted in Bihar following a video that surfaced from a government programme in Patna involving Chief Minister Nitish Kumar. The footage, which has circulated widely on social media, shows the JD(U) leader pulling down a woman’s hijab while handing over a certificate during an official function. The incident has drawn attention to questions of leadership conduct, personal dignity, and constitutional responsibility.
The programme was organised for AYUSH practitioners, where certificates were being formally distributed. In the video, the Chief Minister is seen motioning to a woman doctor to remove her hijab. Before she could respond, he reached out and pulled it down, exposing her mouth and chin. The visuals, accompanied by reactions from those present on the stage, have since become the focal point of political debate.
Opposition Parties Demand Accountability from the Chief Minister
Opposition parties reacted sharply to the incident, calling it inappropriate for a constitutional authority. The Congress described the act as “shameless” and “vile,” asserting that such behaviour undermines the dignity of women and the decorum expected at official government events. The party demanded that Nitish Kumar step down from the post of Chief Minister, citing the seriousness of the episode.
The opposition has framed the issue as one of public accountability, arguing that elected leaders must uphold the highest standards of conduct, particularly when interacting with citizens during official programmes.
RJD Questions Mental Fitness and Leadership Conduct
The Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) questioned Nitish Kumar’s mental fitness following the incident. In a statement posted on X, the party said the Chief Minister’s mental state appeared to be deteriorating, calling the episode deeply concerning. RJD leaders suggested that the act was not an isolated lapse but indicative of a larger issue related to judgment and leadership behaviour.
The remarks have added a political dimension to the controversy, intensifying scrutiny of Nitish Kumar’s role and responsibilities as the head of the state government.
Concerns Raised Over Women’s Dignity and Religious Freedom
RJD spokesperson Ejaz Ahmad stated that the incident reflected the ruling coalition’s attitude towards women and minorities. He argued that forcibly removing a woman’s veil amounts to an infringement on her right to personal dignity and religious freedom. According to Ahmad, such actions violate constitutional guarantees that allow individuals to live according to their cultural and religious beliefs.
The issue has also resonated beyond party politics, with civil rights advocates highlighting the importance of consent, respect, and autonomy in public interactions.
Public Debate on Ethical Standards in Governance
Political analysts note that symbolic actions by leaders often shape public perception of governance. The controversy has reopened discussions on ethical standards, personal boundaries, and the responsibilities of those holding constitutional office. Observers argue that any perceived disregard for individual dignity can weaken public trust in democratic institutions.
As the video continues to circulate, the incident has become a point of reference in broader conversations around leadership accountability and public conduct.
Awaiting Response Amid Growing Political Pressure
With opposition parties continuing to demand answers and accountability, attention is now on the ruling alliance’s response to the controversy. The incident has placed Nitish Kumar’s leadership under renewed scrutiny, particularly at a time when governance credibility remains a key public concern.
The episode underscores the ongoing need for sensitivity, restraint, and respect for constitutional values in public life, especially from those occupying the highest executive positions.
